kfitz/kfitz-site
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

adding all this

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
2025-05-31 08:08:47 -04:00
parent 4277f0cd61
commit 5e90eb288f
77 changed files with 755 additions and 28 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
networking/index.html
View File

@@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ hr.new {
<p>Anyhow, I am wondering at this point whether going with IP Passthrough on the BGW320 is at the root of the problem. If instead I let the AT&amp;T device handle all the WAN/DHCP stuff, and put the Eeros into bridge mode, will the static IP addresses become assignable to devices via the BGW320? If so, will devices connected to the private subnet via the Eeros still be able to talk to the devices on the public subnet? And aside from the <a href="https://support.eero.com/hc/en-us/articles/115000825206-What-advanced-features-do-I-lose-access-to-if-I-put-my-eeros-into-bridge-mode">&quot;advanced features&quot; that Eero tells me I'll lose if I go the bridge mode route</a>, are there other drawbacks?</p>
<p>I think I've talked myself into trying it and seeing what happens... but I'm going to pause for a bit to see if anyone has other suggestions.</p>
<ul class="links-nextprev"><li class="links-nextprev-prev">← Previous<br> <a href="/gitea/">Gitea</a></li>
<ul class="links-nextprev"><li class="links-nextprev-prev">← Previous<br> <a href="/gitea/">Gitea</a></li><li class="links-nextprev-next">Next →<br><a href="/all-this/">All This</a></li>
</ul>
<hyvor-talk-comments website-id="9100" page-id="/networking/"></hyvor-talk-comments>