From 78f59537e1a407238bac79aec7534c0c482d7c6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kathleen Fitzpatrick <3170201+kfitz@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Mon, 12 May 2025 10:14:23 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] rebuild for webmentions 250512-2 --- networking/index.html | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/networking/index.html b/networking/index.html index 2d1c3f09df..97942e8bb6 100644 --- a/networking/index.html +++ b/networking/index.html @@ -687,7 +687,7 @@ hr.new {

Webmentions

-

2 Replies

+

3 Replies

  1. @@ -736,6 +736,32 @@ hr.new {
    2. +
  2. +
    +
    + + + + Kathleen Fitzpatrick + + Kathleen Fitzpatrick + + + + + + +
    +
    + An update to this ask: I more or less flipped the thing upside-down yesterday. Instead of using IP Passthrough to hand all the DHCP business to the Eeros, I instead put the Eeros in bridge mode, so all the DHCP stuff is being handled by the BGW320. It's behaving pretty well, and I have been able to assign a public static IP address to the NAS. The NAS is now of course being subjected to a range of scanning attacks, but my firewall appears to be holding. I would very much like to install a network-level VPN, though (unsurprisingly) AT&T has their hardware locked down in a way that pushes you toward their VPN-as-a-service. If y'all have suggestions for ways to get around that, I'm all ears! #AskFedi #BGW320 #VPN +askfedi +bgw320 +vpn +
    +
    + +
    3. +