diff --git a/_cache/webmentions.json b/_cache/webmentions.json
index ceeba148f5..c89c435567 100644
--- a/_cache/webmentions.json
+++ b/_cache/webmentions.json
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 {
-  "lastFetched": "2025-05-12T11:49:03.352Z",
+  "lastFetched": "2025-05-12T14:13:51.981Z",
   "children": [
     {
       "type": "entry",
@@ -11231,6 +11231,29 @@
       "repost-of": "https://kfitz.info/networking/",
       "wm-property": "repost-of",
       "wm-private": false
+    },
+    {
+      "type": "entry",
+      "author": {
+        "type": "card",
+        "name": "Kathleen Fitzpatrick",
+        "photo": "https://avatars.webmention.io/spaces.hcommons.social/57241974ecb75421b2cd7f4b6e55b9b41d422136f90c7c3f3934059711d6b8fc.png",
+        "url": "https://hcommons.social/@kfitz"
+      },
+      "url": "https://hcommons.social/@kfitz/114494701192136016",
+      "published": "2025-05-12T11:48:14+00:00",
+      "wm-received": "2025-05-12T12:10:11Z",
+      "wm-id": 1910598,
+      "wm-source": "https://brid.gy/comment/mastodon/@kfitz@hcommons.social/114489467396635641/114494701192136016",
+      "wm-target": "https://kfitz.info/networking/",
+      "wm-protocol": "webmention",
+      "content": {
+        "html": "<p>An update to this ask: I more or less flipped the thing upside-down yesterday. Instead of using IP Passthrough to hand all the DHCP business to the Eeros, I instead put the Eeros in bridge mode, so all the DHCP stuff is being handled by the BGW320. It's behaving pretty well, and I have been able to assign a public static IP address to the NAS. The NAS is now of course being subjected to a range of scanning attacks, but my firewall appears to be holding. I would very much like to install a network-level VPN, though (unsurprisingly) AT&amp;T has their hardware locked down in a way that pushes you toward their VPN-as-a-service. If y'all have suggestions for ways to get around that, I'm all ears! <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/AskFedi\">#<span>AskFedi</span></a> <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/BGW320\">#<span>BGW320</span></a> <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/VPN\">#<span>VPN</span></a></p>\n<a class=\"p-category\" href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/askfedi\">askfedi</a>\n<a class=\"p-category\" href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/bgw320\">bgw320</a>\n<a class=\"p-category\" href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/vpn\">vpn</a>",
+        "text": "An update to this ask: I more or less flipped the thing upside-down yesterday. Instead of using IP Passthrough to hand all the DHCP business to the Eeros, I instead put the Eeros in bridge mode, so all the DHCP stuff is being handled by the BGW320. It's behaving pretty well, and I have been able to assign a public static IP address to the NAS. The NAS is now of course being subjected to a range of scanning attacks, but my firewall appears to be holding. I would very much like to install a network-level VPN, though (unsurprisingly) AT&T has their hardware locked down in a way that pushes you toward their VPN-as-a-service. If y'all have suggestions for ways to get around that, I'm all ears! #AskFedi #BGW320 #VPN\naskfedi\nbgw320\nvpn"
+      },
+      "in-reply-to": "https://kfitz.info/networking/",
+      "wm-property": "in-reply-to",
+      "wm-private": false
     }
   ]
 }
\ No newline at end of file