upgrade to 3.0
This commit is contained in:
21
content/blog/2004-07-09-dude-im-almost-famous.md
Normal file
21
content/blog/2004-07-09-dude-im-almost-famous.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "Dude, I'm (Almost) Famous!"
|
||||
date: '2004-07-09T12:10:29-04:00'
|
||||
permalink: /dude-im-almost-famous/
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- academia
|
||||
- publishing
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
So I just got my copy of the [American Literary Scholarship 2002](http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/als/) in the mail, and for the first time ever, I’m mentioned in it.
|
||||
|
||||
Well, sorta.
|
||||
|
||||
In Jerome Klinkowitz’s review article covering recent work on fiction from the 1960s to the present is a paragraph on DeLillo criticism, which includes the following passage:
|
||||
|
||||
> A more recent DeLillo novel gets comprehensive treatment in the essays commissioned by editors Joseph Dewey et al for their [UnderWords: Perspectives on Don DeLillo’s Underworld](http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/0874137853/plannedobsole-20) (Delaware). Much like Pynchon’s *Mason & Dixon*, *Underworld* seems written with complex critical responses in mind, and one of the best is “The Unmaking of History: Baseball, Cold War, and *Underworld*” (pp. 144-60) contributed by Katherine Fitzpatrick. She proposes that for DeLillo history is a weave of narratives, following historian J.H. Heller’s sense of historiographic narratology, centering on “the cultural value of this moment” as opposed to any collection of facts.
|
||||
|
||||
Okay, so yay, me. But… *Katherine*?
|
||||
|
||||
I suppose I should feel better that the blurb gets J. H. *Hexter*‘s name wrong, too. He’s *way* more famous than me, even if he is dead.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user