upgrade to 3.0

This commit is contained in:
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
2024-10-14 19:27:15 -04:00
parent e8f8a543de
commit 655ad0ded8
1988 changed files with 47081 additions and 263 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
---
title: 'The Shape of Thought'
date: '2012-09-13T09:55:22-04:00'
permalink: /the-shape-of-thought/
tags:
- reflecting
---
I mentioned yesterday that Ive been thinking about the next Big Project. Ive been circling it for a while, trying to figure out what several of the various things Ive written recently have to do with one another. And over the last week, I think Ive at least started to get it; Im starting to develop a sense of the overall shape of the thing.
But heres the problem, or at least the surprise: that shape, as its appearing to me right now, is awfully traditional. A Book. Im not positive that the thing is best produced or conveyed that way, but thats the shape thats in my head.
Now that I write that last sentence, it occurs to me that I may mean it more literally than I originally thought. The shape of the book is really in my head, a form that molds thought even as it occurs.[^1] I have no illusion that this is natural, and Im pretty sure that this shape can be changed. But it is a sign of how deeply the structures of book culture are ingrained in all of the ways that I think: after ten years of blogging, after years of research and writing about the potentials that other forms of scholarly communication might take, I still reflexively sketch out book projects in my head.
Of course, calling this a book only really implies that its a predominantly text-based long-form argument. It doesnt necessarily call for print. And it doesnt necessarily call for it to be produced in the traditional way — off-stage, in seclusion, only to be shared (except within carefully controlled circles) when finished.
My hope is that Ill be able to produce this thing in public, whether here or elsewhere, and perhaps as I work its shape might evolve from the book prototype in my head into something a bit more dynamic and fluid. Or perhaps it will turn out that this thing really is best suited to book-like form. I just want to be sure that Im open to the possibilities, that Im not defaulting to the shape I know because I know it.
[^1]: I am now unavoidably thinking about those old Play-Doh toys that allowed you to extrude various shapes of goo by pushing the stuff through a crank-driven mold that bore an awful lot of resemblance to a meat grinder. I would prefer not to have one of those in my head, I think.