kfitz/kfitz.info
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

rebuild for webmentions 250512-2

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Kathleen Fitzpatrick
2025-05-12 10:15:10 -04:00
parent 3e4f6caff3
commit d48bf882f5
1 changed files with 24 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

25
_cache/webmentions.json
View File

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
{
"lastFetched": "2025-05-12T11:49:03.352Z",
"lastFetched": "2025-05-12T14:13:51.981Z",
"children": [
{
"type": "entry",
@@ -11231,6 +11231,29 @@
"repost-of": "https://kfitz.info/networking/",
"wm-property": "repost-of",
"wm-private": false
},
{
"type": "entry",
"author": {
"type": "card",
"name": "Kathleen Fitzpatrick",
"photo": "https://avatars.webmention.io/spaces.hcommons.social/57241974ecb75421b2cd7f4b6e55b9b41d422136f90c7c3f3934059711d6b8fc.png",
"url": "https://hcommons.social/@kfitz"
},
"url": "https://hcommons.social/@kfitz/114494701192136016",
"published": "2025-05-12T11:48:14+00:00",
"wm-received": "2025-05-12T12:10:11Z",
"wm-id": 1910598,
"wm-source": "https://brid.gy/comment/mastodon/@kfitz@hcommons.social/114489467396635641/114494701192136016",
"wm-target": "https://kfitz.info/networking/",
"wm-protocol": "webmention",
"content": {
"html": "<p>An update to this ask: I more or less flipped the thing upside-down yesterday. Instead of using IP Passthrough to hand all the DHCP business to the Eeros, I instead put the Eeros in bridge mode, so all the DHCP stuff is being handled by the BGW320. It's behaving pretty well, and I have been able to assign a public static IP address to the NAS. The NAS is now of course being subjected to a range of scanning attacks, but my firewall appears to be holding. I would very much like to install a network-level VPN, though (unsurprisingly) AT&amp;T has their hardware locked down in a way that pushes you toward their VPN-as-a-service. If y'all have suggestions for ways to get around that, I'm all ears! <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/AskFedi\">#<span>AskFedi</span></a> <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/BGW320\">#<span>BGW320</span></a> <a href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/VPN\">#<span>VPN</span></a></p>\n<a class=\"p-category\" href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/askfedi\">askfedi</a>\n<a class=\"p-category\" href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/bgw320\">bgw320</a>\n<a class=\"p-category\" href=\"https://hcommons.social/tags/vpn\">vpn</a>",
"text": "An update to this ask: I more or less flipped the thing upside-down yesterday. Instead of using IP Passthrough to hand all the DHCP business to the Eeros, I instead put the Eeros in bridge mode, so all the DHCP stuff is being handled by the BGW320. It's behaving pretty well, and I have been able to assign a public static IP address to the NAS. The NAS is now of course being subjected to a range of scanning attacks, but my firewall appears to be holding. I would very much like to install a network-level VPN, though (unsurprisingly) AT&T has their hardware locked down in a way that pushes you toward their VPN-as-a-service. If y'all have suggestions for ways to get around that, I'm all ears! #AskFedi #BGW320 #VPN\naskfedi\nbgw320\nvpn"
},
"in-reply-to": "https://kfitz.info/networking/",
"wm-property": "in-reply-to",
"wm-private": false
}
]
}