Files
kfitz.info/content/blog/2002-06-25-dept-of-musical-revisionism.md
Kathleen Fitzpatrick 655ad0ded8 upgrade to 3.0
2024-10-14 19:27:15 -04:00

29 lines
2.3 KiB
Markdown
Raw Permalink Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

---
title: 'Dept. of Musical Revisionism'
date: '2002-06-25T10:59:52-04:00'
permalink: /dept-of-musical-revisionism/
tags:
- listening
---
Earlier that day, over lunch:
Me (hearing “Born in the U.S.A.” over the restaurant P.A. system): How on earth did those Republican knuckleheads hear this song and decide it was a patriotic anthem?
He: It makes total sense. Their whole rhetorical m.o. involves not fully understanding what theyre quoting, and then completely revising what the original means when theyre found out.
Okay, fine. Its the same kind of revisions that are worked by television advertising all the time, when a song like [this](http://www.sgi.net/zeppelin/lyrics/songs/04.rar.html) is used to plug a product like [this](http://www.cadillac.com/cadillacjsp/models/deville/index.html). (The revised meaning of which seems to become — what? — I havent had sex in years, so Im buying a really big car?)
But the impulse toward this kind of lyrical revisionism just became too much that night, on our dinner cruise — and yes, yes, the ironies, given the [reading](http://search.barnesandnoble.com/booksearch/isbnInquiry.asp?userid=0IBSHWP639&isbn=0316925284) Im doing this week — after a pleasant half-hour standing at the rail, watching Waikiki drift by. As we walked back into the dining room to pay the lovely young man whod kept us supplied with Mai Tais for the evening, I suddenly felt uneasy, unsettled, nervous, wrong. Took a moment to take stock: no, I have everything I came with; no, Im not feeling ill; no, there doesnt appear to be disaster looming just ahead.
It required a few moments to sink in. Literally. First, I noticed the really bad rendition being done by the man at the synthesizer and the woman at the mike. Then, I recognized that this was a bad rendition of a song that I hated in the first place. Its that whatsername song, gee, you know, the Canadian chick whos always — yeah, Celine, right. From that movie, you know…
*Titanic.*
I ask you — seriously, tell me if its just me — but is this an appropriate song to be playing on board?
Okay, sure, its about a love that survives even death, even an icy cold watery death — but see, theres that whole death part, and the water, and gee, look, were on a boat! In the water!
Its not revisionism. Its just flat not paying attention.