16 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
16 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: 'The Book May Not Be Dead...'
|
||
date: '2004-01-23T11:06:05-05:00'
|
||
permalink: /the-book-may-not-be-dead/
|
||
tags:
|
||
- novels
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
…but it’s possible that the book review is.
|
||
|
||
Or at least that the serious book-review publication is. Witness this [demoralizing development](http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=57&aid=59576) at the [New York Times Book Review](http://nytimes.com/pages/books/review/index.html): as if we didn’t all already know that the NYTBR was skewed toward non-fiction, this is in the process of becoming official editorial policy. Moreover, what fiction gets reviewed will now lean explicitly toward the airport-novel, and decidedly away from the literary.
|
||
|
||
What effect might this shift have on the publishing industry? Will the industry turn away, at least in part, from the NYTBR’s arbitration of success, or will this “marginalization”[^1] of literature in the review-world cause the publishing industry to follow suit?
|
||
|
||
[^1]: I have to put this in scare quotes in no small part because I’ve spent the last several decades (or so it feels) working on a manuscript that’s precisely about how these metaphors of “marginalization” with regard to the literary are (a) untrue, and (b) politically suspect. I now find myself, in many regards, pondering the ironies of that stance.
|