Files
kfitz.info/content/blog/2004-05-30-naming-the-future.md
Kathleen Fitzpatrick 655ad0ded8 upgrade to 3.0
2024-10-14 19:27:15 -04:00

2.6 KiB
Raw Blame History

title, date, permalink, tags
title date permalink tags
Naming the Future 2004-05-30T09:52:00-04:00 /naming-the-future/
mediacommons

Well, the site renovations seem pretty much in hand — things are basically working (though you should let me know if you find something that isnt), and the redirects and 404s are doing their respective jobs.

So, given that, like George, Ive got a big list of stuff to do this summer, its back to work for me.

One such project, which I imagine will take some time, is the start-up of the new online scholarly imprint Ive been talking about here for a while now. And the two initial tasks in that start-up, I think, are naming an editorial board, and naming the thing itself.

Ive decided that, while MediaCommons and MediaTexts have much to recommend them, neither quite does what Im hoping for; each is, in a weird way, too specific. As Im hoping that the new thing will evolve into something as-yet unimaginable, I dont want to saddle it with a name that seems to rein in its future, circumscribing its range.

Ive spent some time over the last few weeks contemplating names, and particularly software names, trying to figure out why I like the ones I like, and why the others leave me cold. After a fair bit of thought, Ive determined that my favorite such name remains Eudora, which has both an admirable simplicity and a impressive depth of reference, and which has in some mysterious way passed into the computing vernacular, seeming as obvious a choice as “Mail.” (No offense, Steve.) Thats the kind of name I want — something evocative and non-literal but simple. (And something for which the domain is available.)

It may be that Im too concerned with this naming thing. A creative writing prof of mine once argued in class that a title was unimportant, nothing more than a handle with which one could pick up a text and carry it around. I disagreed then, and I disagree now; as Pynchon has it in Gravitys Rainbow, “names by themselves may have no magic, but the act of naming, the physical utterance, obeys the pattern.” I cant help but feel that the name is key, that the act of naming can determine the things future.

So what are your favorite names — of software packages, of websites, of organizations? And why? What principles at work in those names might I learn from here?