49 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
49 lines
2.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: Advocating
|
||
date: '2006-01-24T07:44:01-05:00'
|
||
permalink: /advocating/
|
||
tags:
|
||
- research
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
I spent much of yesterday in the East Baton Rouge Parish Public Library, reading through the microfilm archive of the Baton Rouge Morning Advocate, the predecessor of today’s [Advocate](http://www.2theadvocate.com), the sole remaining daily outlet here. I’m doing this at the East Baton Rouge Parish Public Library, wherein I have not set foot since high school, because they have the only complete set of the paper’s microfilms. The LSU Library has weirdly [spotty](http://lsu.louislibraries.org/uhtbin/cgisirsi/HoTSd5jKT3/MIDL-MAIN/315910108/9) holdings, and is completely missing the first year that I need to read. Which is just bizarre. That said, it’s been cool, if time-consuming and mildly nausea-inducing, going back through these papers and watching history unfold. But I’m really wishing there were a better way to get the stuff I’m looking for. And so I’ve got this running dialogue in my head:
|
||
|
||
— Do I really need to read the entire paper, for the whole year?
|
||
|
||
No. There’s a particular set of stories that I’m trying to track.
|
||
|
||
— Couldn’t I do that electronically, by, like, figuring out what days the stories I’m tracking appeared, and then just hop on the microfilm to get the stories themselves?
|
||
|
||
No. The Advocate’s own electronic [archive](http://www.2theadvocate.com/archives/) only dates from 1995. And Lexis-Nexis, which happily does index the Advocate, dates all the way back to 1994.
|
||
|
||
— What year does the story you’re trying to track start?
|
||
|
||
1953\.
|
||
|
||
— So, you’re, like, loading up the machine with the film of Jan. 1- Jan. 20, 1953, and paging through the entire thing, looking for relevant headlines?
|
||
|
||
Yep.
|
||
|
||
— How long is that taking?
|
||
|
||
About an hour per month.
|
||
|
||
— How many years do you want to cover?
|
||
|
||
Twenty.
|
||
|
||
— Twenty?
|
||
|
||
Not wall-to-wall. But the stories I’m looking at extend at least over that period of time.
|
||
|
||
— Isn’t there a better way of doing this?
|
||
|
||
…
|
||
|
||
That’s where I pretty much stall out, every time through this little dialogue. And I stop, and I search around for another index that might help me, and I grind my teeth and go back to the microfilm.
|
||
|
||
The good news is that there’s a dissertation out there that covers much of what I’m interested in, and that will probably help me narrow down the post-1953 work I need to do. The bad news is that the dissertation has been checked out, and isn’t due back for another three days, assuming it comes in on time.
|
||
|
||
Of course, it’s also available on microfilm.
|
||
|