16 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
16 lines
1.5 KiB
Markdown
---
|
||
title: 'Reading, Privacy, and Scholarly Networks'
|
||
date: '2017-01-23T09:23:45-05:00'
|
||
permalink: /reading-privacy-and-scholarly-networks/
|
||
tags:
|
||
- academia
|
||
- networks
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
Sarah Bond published a column on [Forbes.com](http://www.forbes.com/sites/drsarahbond/2017/01/23/dear-scholars-delete-your-account-at-academia-edu/#3fc230302ee0) this morning on the importance of not for profit scholarly networks. I’m thrilled that she mentioned not only [my blog post](/academia-not-edu/) but also the work we’re doing at [Humanities Commons](https://hcommons.org). But if she hasn’t convinced you that it’s time to #DeleteAcademiaEdu yet, maybe this will: Friday, the network launched a new “prime” feature that allows members to pay to see the identities of users who are reading the work they share. That is to say: if you are reading things on Academia.edu, the network may sell your user info.
|
||
|
||
That they’re offering to sell this info to the author of the work involved does not make it okay. This is a frightening violation of the privacy standards that — a key point of comparison — libraries have long maintained with respect to reader activity. And selling your data to authors may only be the beginning.
|
||
|
||
I don’t want to read too much into the fact that they launched this “feature” on inauguration day. But the coincidence really begs scholars to become even more vigilant about where they’re sharing their work, and what networks they’re supporting as they access the work of others.
|
||
|